Preview

Проблемы геронауки

Расширенный поиск

Половые и возрастные различия пациентов с хронической сердечной недостаточностью

https://doi.org/10.37586/2949-4745-3-2023-134-142

Аннотация

Возрастающее бремя заболеваемости хронической сердечной недостаточностью пациентов пожилого и старческого возраста, появление новых сведений о половых различиях течения данной патологии определяют необходимость обзора существующих данных по указанной проблеме.

Цель работы. Систематизация актуальных данных о половых различиях хронической сердечной недостаточности, в том числе среди пациентов пожилого и старческого возраста.

Материалы и методы. Проведен поиск литературных источников за 2011– 2023 годы в базах данных PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, GoogleScholar, eLibrary. Критериями включения являлись данные о половозрастных различиях в течении хронической сердечной недостаточности. Предпочтительными языками были русский и английский. В ходе первоначального поиска было найдено 4228 источников. Отобраны полнотекстные публикации в рецензируемых изданиях с результатами рандомизированных и нерандомизированных клинических исследований, мета-анализов и систематических обзоров, одномоментных исследований.

Результаты и обсуждение. Охарактеризованы половые различия факторов риска, эпидемиологии, патофизиологии, клинических проявлений, лечения хронической сердечной недостаточности (ХСН), в том числе среди пациентов пожилого и старческого возраста. Представлены сведения, доказывающие необходимость дифференцированного подхода в определении тактики ведения пациентов разного пола с ХСН.

Заключение. Необходима разработка новых научных программ и клинических рекомендаций по дифференцированному ведению пациентов с ХСН, в том числе пожилого и старческого возраста, с целью улучшения прогноза и качества жизни.

Об авторах

Т. О. Бродовская
Уральский государственный медицинский университет
Россия

Бродовская Татьяна Олеговна, д-р. мед. наук, доцент, и.о. заведующего кафедрой пропедевтики внутренних болезней

Екатеринбург



К. С. Вшивцев
Центральная городская клиническая больница №6
Россия

Вшивцев Кирилл Сергеевич, врач по медицинской профилактике

Екатеринбург



Список литературы

1. Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145(8):e153-e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052

2. Riccardi M, Sammartino AM, Piepoli M, et al. Heart failure: an update from the last years and a look at the near future. ESC Heart Fail. 2022;9(6):3667–3693. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14257

3. Savarese G, Becher PM, Lund LH et al. Global burden of heart failure: a comprehensive and updated review of epidemiology. Cardiovasc Res. 2023;118(17):3272–3287. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvac013

4. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: developed by the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. EurJHeartFail. 2022; 24: 4–131. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368

5. Лясникова Е.А., Федотов П.А., Трукшина М.А. с соавт. Менеджмент больных с хронической сердечной недостаточностью в Российской Федерации: горизонты и реалии второй декады XXI века. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2021;26(9):4658.

6. Lloyd-Jones DM, Larson MG, Leip EP et al. Lifetime risk for developing congestive heart failure: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2002;106:3068–3072. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000039105.49749.6f

7. Bleumink GS , Knetsch AM , Sturkenboom MC et al. Quantifying the heart failure epidemic: prevalence, incidence rate, lifetime risk and prognosis of heart failure The Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J 2004;25:1614–1619. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.038

8. Magnussen C, Niiranen TJ, Ojeda FM et al. Sex-Specific epidemiology of heart failure risk and mortality in europe: results from the BiomarCaRE consortium. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7:204–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.08.008

9. Bragazzi NL, Zhong W, Shu J, et al. Burden of heart failure and underlying causes in 195 countries and territories from 1990 to 2017. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021;28(15):1682–1690. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa147

10. Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659

11. Heidenreich PA, Albert NM, Allen LA, et al. Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. CircHeartFail. 2013;6(3):606–619. doi: 10.1161/HHF.0b013e318291329a

12. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):e38–360. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000350

13. Strömberg A, Mårtensson J. Gender differences in patients with heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003;2(1):7–18. doi: 10.1016/S1474-5151(03)00002-1

14. Хроническая сердечная недостаточность. Клинические рекомендации 2020. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2020;25(11):4083. [2020 Clinical practice guidelines for Chronic heart failure. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(11):4083. (In Russ.)] doi:10.15829/1560-4071-2020-40

15. Фомин И.В. Хроническая сердечная недостаточность в Российской Федерации: что сегодня мы знаем и что должны де­лать. Российский кардиологический журнал. 2016;(8):7–13. doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-2016-8-7-13

16. Sillars A, Ho FK, Pell GP, et al. Sex differences in the association of risk factors for heart failure incidence and mortality. Heart. 2020;106:203-212. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-314878

17. Cesaroni G, Mureddu GF, Agabiti N et al. Sex differences in factors associated with heart failure and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction: a cross-sectional population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10442-3

18. Kannel WB, Hjortland M, Castelli WP. Role of diabetes in congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. Am J Cardiol. 1974;34:29–34. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(74)90089-7

19. He J, Ogden LG, Bazzano LA et al. Risk factors for congestive heart failure in US men and women: NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:996–1002. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.7.996

20. Eaton CB, Pettinger M, Rossouw J et al. Risk factors for incident hospitalized heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction in a multiracial cohort of postmenopausal women. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9(10):e002883. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002883

21. Ambikairajah A, Walsh E, Tabatabaei-Jafari H et al. Fat mass changes during menopause: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221:393–409.e50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.023

22. Mehta LS, Watson KE, Barac A et al. Cardiovascular Disease and Breast Cancer: where These Entities Intersect: a Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137:e30–e66. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000556

23. Drafts BC, Twomley KM, D'Agostino RJr et al. Low to moderate dose anthracycline-based chemotherapy is associated with early noninvasive imaging evidence of subclinical cardiovascular disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:877–885. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.017

24. Chen J, Long JB, Hurria A et al. Incidence of heart failure or cardiomyopathy after adjuvant trastuzumab therapy for breast cancer. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2504–2512. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.068

25. Narayan HK, Finkelman B, French B et al. Detailed echocardiographic phenotyping in breast cancer patients: associations with ejection fraction decline, recovery, and heart failure symptoms over 3 years of follow-up. Circulation. 2017;135:1397–1412. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023463

26. Saiki H, Petersen IA, Scott CG et al. Risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in older women after contemporary radiotherapy for breast cancer. Circulation. 2017;135:1388–1396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025434

27. Amir E, Seruga B, Niraula S et al. Toxicity of adjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:1299–1309. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr242

28. Bairey Merz CN, Nelson MD, Cheng S et al. Sex differences and the left ventricle: morphology matters. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;21(9):991–993. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa195

29. Chandramouli C, Teng T-HK, Tay WT et al. ASIAN-HF Investigators. Impact of diabetes and sex in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients from the ASIAN-HF registry. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019;21(3):297–307. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1358

30. Pandey A, Omar W, Ayers C et al. Sex and race differences in lifetime risk of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Circulation. 2018;137(17):1814– 1823. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031622

31. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/ AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2018;138:e484–e594 doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066

32. Shah SJ, Lam CSP, Svedlund S et al. Prevalence and correlates of coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PROMIS-HFpEF. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3439–3450. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy531

33. Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ, Walsh MN et al. Ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): developing evidence-based therapies and research agenda for the next decade. Circulation. 2017;135(11):1075–92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024534

34. Бродовская Т.О., Аребьев Э.В., Гришина И.Ф.с соавт. Острый коронарный синдром у женщин. Есть ли особенности? Уральский медицинский журнал. 2023;22(4):128–139. doi.org/10.52420/2071-5943-2023-22-4-128-139

35. Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex and Gender Differences in Heart Failure. IntJHeartFail. 2020;2(3):157–181. doi: 10.36628/ijhf.2020.0004

36. Dewan P , Rorth R , Jhund PS et al. Differential impact of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction on men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:29–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.081

37. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. JAmSocEchocardiogr. 2015;28(1):1–39. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003

38. Bachmann KN, Huang S, Lee H et al. Effect of testosterone on natriuretic peptide levels. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:1288–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.062

39. Soldin OP, Mattison DR. Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48:143–157. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200948030-00001

40. Rosano GM, Lewis B, Agewall S et al. Gender differences in the effect of cardiovascular drugs: a position document of the Working Group on Pharmacology and Drug Therapy of the ESC. Eur Heart J.2015;36:2677–2680

41. Jochmann N, Stangl K, Garbe E et al. Female-specific aspects in the pharmacotherapy of chronic cardiovascular diseases. Eur Heart J.2005;26:1585–1595. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi397

42. CONSENSUS Trial Study Group. Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). N Engl J Med. 1987;316(23):1429–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198706043162301

43. RutherfordJD, PfefferMA, MoyeLAetal. Effects of captopril on ischemic events after myocardial infarction. Results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement trial. SAVE investigators. Circulation. 1994;90:1731–1738. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.4.1731

44. The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. TheSOLVDinvestigators. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:293– 302. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199108013250501

45. ClelandJG, ErhardtL, MurrayG et al. Effect of ramipril on morbidity and mode of death among survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. A report from the AIRE Study investigators. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:41–51

46. Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J et al. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:145–153. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001203420301

47. Santema BT, Ouwerkerk W, Tromp J et al. Identifying optimal doses of heart failure medications in men compared with women: a prospective, observational, cohort study. Lancet. 2019;394(10205):1254–1263. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31792-1

48. Danielson C, Lileikyte G, Ouwerkerk W, S P Lam C, Erlinge D, Teng TK. Sex differences in efficacy of pharmacological therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis. ESC Heart Fail. 2022;9(4):2753–2761. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13974

49. Eugene AR. Gender based Dosing of Metoprolol in the Elderly using Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulations. Int J Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2016 May;5(3):209–215

50. Regitz-Zagrosek V. Sex and Gender Differences in Heart Failure. Int J Heart Fail. 2020;2(3):157–181. doi: 10.36628/ijhf.2020.0004

51. Lam CSP, Arnott C, Beale AL et al. Sex differences in heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(47):3859–3868c. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz835

52. Kotecha D, Manzano L, Krum H et al. Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure Collaborative Group. Effect of age and sex on efficacy and tolerability of β blockers in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: individual patient data meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;353:i1855. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i1855

53. Harada E,Mizuno Y,Kugimiya F et al. Abstract 13269: GenderDifferenceofBeta-BlockerEffectinPatientsWithHeartFailurePres ervedEjectionFraction. Circulation. 2019;140:A13269

54. Tamargo J, Caballero R, Delpón E. Sex-related differences in the pharmacological treatment of heart failure. Pharmacol Ther. 2022;229:107891. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107891

55. Merrill M, Sweitzer NK, Lindenfeld J et al. Sex Differences in Outcomes and Responses to Spironolactone in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of TOPCAT Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7(3):228–238. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.01.003

56. Rossello X, Ferreira JP, Pocock SJ et al. Sex differences in mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist trials: a pooled analysis of three large clinical trials. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22(5):834–844. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1740

57. Regitz-Zagrosek V. Therapeutic implications of the gender-specific aspects of cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:425–438. doi: 10.1038/nrd2032

58. van Veldhuisen DJ, Rienstra M, van der Meer P. Value of digoxin in patients with heart failure: new pieces to the puzzle. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20(7):1146–1147. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1200

59. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM et al. EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(22):2117–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720

60. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW et al. CANVAS Program Collaborative Group. Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):644–657. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925

61. Wiviott SD, Raz I, Bonaca MP et al. Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(4):347–357. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1812389

62. Perkovic V, Jardine MJ, Neal B et al. Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2295–2306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811744

63. Rådholm K, Zhou Z, Clemens K et al. Effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes in women versus men. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(2):263–266. doi: 10.1111/dom.13876

64. Rivera FB, Tang VAS, De Luna DV et al. Sex differences in cardiovascular outcomes of SGLT-2 inhibitors in heart failure randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J Plus. 2023;26:100261. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100261

65. Solomon SD , McMurray JJV , Anand IS et al. Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. N Engl J Med.2019;381(17):1609–1620. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908655

66. Klein L, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Bonow RO et al. Quality of care and outcomes in women hospitalized for heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2011;4(5):589–98. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.110.960484

67. Lund LH, Braunschweig F, Benson L et al. Association between demographic, organizational, clinical, and socio-economic characteristics and underutilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19(10):1270–1279. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.781

68. Koitabashi N, Kass DA. Reverse remodeling in heart failure--mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2011;9(3):147–57. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2011.172

69. Kormos RL, Cowger J, Pagani FD et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database Annual Report: Evolving Indications, Outcomes, and Scientific Partnerships. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107(2):341–353. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.011

70. Blumer V, Mendirichaga R, Hernandez GA et al. Sex-specific outcome disparities in patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ASAIOJ. 2018;64:440–449. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000695

71. MagnussenC, BernhardtAM, OjedaFM, etal. Gender differences and outcomes in left ventricular assist device support: the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support. JH eartLungTransplant.2018;37:61–70. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.06.016

72. DeFilippis EM, Truby LK, Garan AR et al. Sex-Related Differences in Use and Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Bridge to Transplantation. JACC Heart Fail. 2019;7(3):250–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.01.008

73. Chambers DC, Cherikh WS, Harhay MO et al. International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-sixth adult lung and heart-lung transplantation Report-2019; Focus theme: Donor and recipient size match. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019;38(10):1042–1055. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.08.001

74. Lewis EF, Lamas GA, O'Meara E et al. Characterization of health-related quality of life in heart failure patients with preserved versus low ejection fraction in CHARM. Eur J Heart Fail. 2007;9(1):83– 91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2006.10.012

75. Levy D, Kenchaiah S, Larson MG et al. Long-term trends in the incidence of and survival with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(18):1397–402. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020265

76. Gerber Y, Weston SA, Redfield MM et al. L. A contemporary appraisal of the heart failure epidemic in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2000 to 2010. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(6):996–1004. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0924

77. Lam CS, Carson PE, Anand IS et al. Sex differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes in elderly patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (I-PRESERVE) trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5(5):571–8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.970061


Рецензия

Для цитирования:


Бродовская Т.О., Вшивцев К.С. Половые и возрастные различия пациентов с хронической сердечной недостаточностью. Проблемы геронауки. 2023;(3):134-142. https://doi.org/10.37586/2949-4745-3-2023-134-142

For citation:


Brodovskaya T.O., Vshivtsev K.S. Age and Sex Differences in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. Problems of Geroscience. 2023;(3):134-142. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.37586/2949-4745-3-2023-134-142

Просмотров: 254


ISSN 2949-4745 (Print)
ISSN 2949-4753 (Online)